MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, more straightforward to write, more straightforward to read.
PARAGRAPH 1 experience that is practical contacts, on the job skills. EG: Studies from the UK Government show graduates with work experience are two times as prone to find employment…..
Better preparation, opportunity to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and sector that is private helps student decide on future before committing long term, EG 1/6 students will change their advanced schooling course while at uni….
Many individuals genuinely believe that it’s safer to learn something in a group rather than individually. Would you agree or disagree?
Agree – learning in group has advantages that are many of teamwork could be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise
Paragraph 2– that is disagree is better
Self reliant, own the result, not based upon others
More mature way, more responsible
Topic and Answer: Education (child)
Some people genuinely believe that children must do organised activities within their time that is free while believe that children should always be absolve to do what they need to complete in their free time. Which viewpoint can you agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to support your answer.
PARAGRAPH 1 favour that is-In of them choose.
-benefits letting the mind wonder, children can go to town, find themselves, do whatever they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent research has revealed 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it might be unfair for this minority.
PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the institution
-need time to plan
-possible ‘equipment’ to shop for
-furthermore studies show that mental performance operates better after a distraction from a structured task such as studying.
Topic and Answer: Globalisation
Many individuals say that globalisation additionally the growing quantity of multinational companies have a effect that is negative the environment. Which viewpoint can you agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to support your answer. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to guide your situation.
PARAGRAPH 1 -DEFINITELY DAMAGING THE ENVIRONMENTAL SURROUNDINGS interaction that is-Increased countries
-Increase in products or services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop for the world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these may have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP gulf coast of florida, oil spill, destroyed the ecosystem that is local…
Scientists think that in order to protect the environmental surroundings, people must use less energy in their lives that are daily. However, a lot of people have never changed the way they live. How come you would imagine lots of people never have taken action that is individual? What could be done to encourage them to do something?
Ideas for body paragraph 1
Not taken action that is individual:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy for the commons
– Collective problem – simpler to shirk responsibility
Ideas for body paragraph 2
What could be done to cause them to become do something?
– Media campaigns by the us government
– Tax or financial incentives EG In Tokyo ……
Some genuinely believe that could be the responsibility of men and women to deal with the environment. Others say it is the government that will take care regarding the environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
People should take care of the surroundings because:
We are the consumers, we vote with this wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – consumers are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)
Government should take care of the surroundings because:
they will have the capacity to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
Supposed to be guardians of this country, which means that collectively these are generally guardians of the earth… not true in fact
Both should be doing more!
In many countries small shops and town centers are going away from business, because people have a tendency to drive to the large stores that are out-of-town. This results in an increase in car use, and it also implies that people essay help without cars don’t have a lot of access to out-of-town stores. Do you think advantages of such development outweigh its disadvantages?